Joined
·
2 Posts
Has anybody used a 4" angle head for smooth walls, and if so what do you think of them? I've had a cheap 3.5" and hated it, thinking of buying either a tapetech 3.5 or a tapeworm 4.
Are there any plasic parts on those Goldblatt angleheads?Here is the tapeworm, and goldblatt 4 inch heads next to dm 3.5.
That tapeworm is a real sweet head, Does a great job. Isnt the goldblatt a whopper, The biggest head i think. Only on the skids though, Same width as the tapeworm.
This would have more to do with the tape radius left by the roller and first pass.From the feedback I've heard. The TW 4" is a great angle head if you have to do your own sanding. (no burning into the tape).
Tell them to use thinner mud. It's only a shallow fill.However, if you have to push it with a standard angle box you will be worn out by the end of the day to fill that huge area.
You have to be nice because they are your customers but I'm not similarly constrained so I can be a little more blunt. If they haven't figured out the two points above then I would take their feedback with a grain of salt.Again, since I don't run these tools, I can only comment on my customer's feedback. This is one example of getting a-lot of response back from the end user.
Have you actually used a tapeworm 4 jason?? Smaller heads cover less than the tapeworm, Hence tape only barly covered in some cases, This 4 inch head covers much more, Less chance of tapeblow out. But yes, the tape rolling needs to right as well.This would have more to do with the tape radius left by the roller and first pass.
Tell them to use thinner mud. It's only a shallow fill.
You have to be nice because they are your customers but I'm not similarly constrained so I can be a little more blunt. If they haven't figured out the two points above then I would take their feedback with a grain of salt.
On each wall, one side of the blade rests on the wall and the other side tracks down the tape radius, no? If not then something is misset. Angles shouldn't be a deep fill. If you've got mud built up in the angle, something's wrong. There shouldn't really be any need for a 4" width to graduate corner kickout. Is your mud deeper than 1mm over the board at the edge of the tape, caz?Have you actually used a tapeworm 4 jason?? Smaller heads cover less than the tapeworm, Hence tape only barly covered in some cases, This 4 inch head covers much more, Less chance of tapeblow out. But yes, the tape rolling needs to right as well.
Bollocks, Its a deeper fill than smaller heads, You wont run it on an angle box, You need a runner, ATT Craig is correct, Just ask srdrywall, He tryed it, and brandon at walltools traded him a 3.5 head.
He said the truth, Your feedbacks no better.
The top blades on an angle head should be crowned, To leave some mud there, Not flat, or it can scrape it off, ish, You know what i mean. The tapeworm 4 has a far ish crown, and its bigger, So it needs more mud, Its prob 1-2mm thick at the tape edge, I can quickly pass a machine sander over the corners and not get a tapeblow out, I couldnt do that with a smaller head. It really does need a runner or you will struggle :yes:On each wall, one side of the blade rests on the wall and the other side tracks down the tape radius, no? If not then something is misset. Angles shouldn't be a deep fill. If you've got mud built up in the angle, something's wrong. There shouldn't really be any need for a 4" width to graduate corner kickout. Is your mud deeper than 1mm over the board at the edge of the tape, caz?
Yes, there will be a few microns more of mud over the tape edge as the angle head gets wider but I think you're mistaking depth of fill for the mud's resistance to flow to the outside of a 4" blade.
Interesting. This has not been my experience.The top blades on an angle head should be crowned
Interesting. This has not been my experience.
I was thinking on getting the TW 4" for the finish , I am flushing with 3.5 TT and finishing with itThe top blades on an angle head should be crowned, To leave some mud there, Not flat, or it can scrape it off, ish, You know what i mean. The tapeworm 4 has a far ish crown, and its bigger, So it needs more mud, Its prob 1-2mm thick at the tape edge, I can quickly pass a machine sander over the corners and not get a tapeblow out, I couldnt do that with a smaller head. It really does need a runner or you will struggle :yes:
I've only run Tapetechs. They have no crown. Tape coverage is afforded by the tape radius in the angle from the roller.Interesting again, If i took my DM, Goldblatt, and tapeworm heads and put them on a table in a dark room and took a small torch and put it behind the angle head and looked accross the table at it, I see light, They all have a crown in the top blade factory set, If this crown taken out and the blades made flat, Then its a scraper, It will float over the mud if you use it lightly, But as you would push harder or softer then the muds different thickness, Push harder, then less mud over the tape, Not such an issue if the top blade has crown. Better tape cover.
I did post some pics on it once, Dammed if i could find that thread again??
I think its ATT Craigs turn for a say, Do you set the top blade on the angle heads with a slight crown or am i full of crap??
No, table must be warpedLike this.
Why yes, With an advance or tapepro internal mudhead that would work well, Not so much the can am, Its smaller and puts mud in the centre, The advance spreads it wider.I was thinking on getting the TW 4" for the finish , I am flushing with 3.5 TT and finishing with it
I am using a CP tube to apply the mud for finish will CP tube work with the TW 4" ?:blink:
When I am done setting up angle heads, I will only tighten the 2 of the 3 setscrews (leaving the middle one loose).I think its ATT Craigs turn for a say, Do you set the top blade on the angle heads with a slight crown or am i full of crap??
Like this.